Tanent absconding and have sub let shop

We have rented a shop for a lease of 15 years expiring years back .we filed a case for eviction on banafied need and subeeting...both the grounds were no established...n we lost the case in lower n sesseion courts and appeal was also rejected by high court 2015...statting that the as per tanent statement and records he is in possesion of shop running pushpanjali firm using electricty n phone from years.and subtanent and his son denial statements with concerned shop and the persons need the shop could not be eximned as he was abroad that time...there was a sub letting which was not proved...later on tanent became defaulter from banks loans n 138 cheque bouncing cases and 420.as well as paments and settle ment act ..n ran away with permanent arrest warrent since 2012 from bhopal.with subtanent in possession...we could not inform hc about him and appel was rejected....now we have filed a new case in mp accomdation act for tanent abconding arrears of rent, damage to property ect..(one extra floor made)..where the court found him abconding here we made the sevents of the shop as party ...they beeing sevent of subletter...confessed to be the servent of tanent...,which court did not agree in order.because of no legal authorization and.made eviction order in favour of us. the servent were paying rent on behalf of tanent with his false signatures. now after winning the case...the subtanent and servents had put down a revision under 23 e of mo accomodation act and has taken stay......the signatures on vakalatnama r false.the order from rent control was of vacant possession with 23 j but no application of bonafied need was made as the tanent was not there.......please suggest....they will take advantage of old case we lost with tanent...making a senario that tanent exixt n we r legal servent acting on his behalf...they r renuing hid goomasta nagarnigam documents etc by personation. revision is admitted by hc on ground whather the oder was with in jurisdiction or not....we have now filed disposal..... now shop in 2018 has been attched for kurji and recovery of tanent by tax deparment now subtanent second son not party to cases has made a forged document stating that tanent has aggreed upon to use this premises since 2012 and the stock furniture in shop does not belong to tanent he is only a comission agent in written to tax deoart ment...... hc advocates says that the document is not records part case will be remanded... pl suggest what to do.....interested in filing criminal case against all of them abhishek