Judgment related

Sir,my father was allotted a land by a oral partition made between him and his brothers three decades ago.After that he enjoyed tittle of the land and had a tittle deed for that land too.In 2010 my father gifted the land to me,after that I enjoyed the property and I hadthe tittle deed.My dad also paid taxes to government for that land.Also he gave front portion of land to government to make a road.I have the documents for these. But in 2011 my father's brother's sons made a forged tittle deed saying that the land belongs to them and prevented me to enjoy my property. So I filed a petition to cancel the forged tittle deed made by them. In the petition given by me I submitted the witness documents such as the tittle deed of my father,his tax paid documents and document given by government that he had given part of land to make road. Unexpectedly in the petition given by me it is said that the oral partition was made in the year 1985.But to my father tittle deed was given in 1984. On the other side,the respondent side filed a petition saying that the land was allotted to his father by the partition. But they don't have any documents to prove that they enjoyed the land. The court disposed my petition saying that it is not possible to have a tittle deed in 1984 before the oral partition which is made in 1985. My question is that is it right dispose the petition just because that I stated that the oral partition was done in 1985(but it was actually done before that,I don't know the exact year) and not considering the document proofs that I submitted such as tittle deed of my father and his tax paid documents,and the document showing that he given part of land to government to make road.