my wife filed 498a, 307, 406 and dv act

In the matter of an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure affirmed on 18.12.2014 in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.1365/2014 dated 14.12.2014 under Sections 498A/323/342/509/307/406/506/34 IPC and Section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. And In Re : Sanjay Dasgupta & Anr. …Petitioners. Mr. Apalok Basu … For the petitioners. Mr. Bidyut Roy … For the State. Apprehending arrest in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.1365/2014 dated 14.12.2014 under Sections 498A/323/342/509/307/406/506/34 IPC and Section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the petitioners have approached this Court for prearrest bail. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. Perused the materials available from the Case Diary. The petitioner No.1 is the husband and the petitioner No.2 is the mother-in-law. At the very outset, the learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that although he is not 2 admitting any of the allegations made against the petitioners but as a matter of good gesture and as it is the moral obligation of the husband/petitioner No.1 to maintain his wife, the petitioner No.1/husband is now agreeable to maintain the de facto complainant/wife according to his ability and offered to pay a sum of Rs.4,000/- per month as her maintenance. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that the maintenance for this month shall be sent to the de facto complainant/wife within two weeks from this date and thereafter by the 7th of each succeeding month. On the face of such submission, the learned Counsel for the State has also not opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Having regard to the voluntary offer and undertaking of the husband/petitioner No.1 to maintain the wife, in our opinion, no useful purpose will be served by taking him into custody as also his other relation, who is before us. Accordingly, the prayer stands allowed. 3 It is, therefore, directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners in connection with the aforesaid case, they shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer upon furnishing Bond of Rs. 5,000/- each on condition that after release, they shall surrender before the concerned court within four weeks thereafter. This order is subject to the conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. We, however, make it clear that the payment of maintenance to the wife, as voluntarily offered by the husband/petitioner No.1, through his counsel, shall be in force, till any order of maintenance is made by a competent court. We also make it clear that the quantification of amount of maintenance and the entitlement of maintenance by the wife, if arises for a decision before a court of law in terms of statutory provisions, such court must not be swayed by this voluntary offer of maintenance by the husband/petitioner No.1 and order must be made in accordance with law. 4 The husband/petitioner No.1 shall be obliged to pay maintenance to the wife, as voluntarily offered by him, so long no order in this regard is passed by a competent court. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. Let a plain copy of this order, duly countersigned by the Assistant Registrar (Court) be given to the learned Counsel for the State to to do the needful. now the my question is 1. this allegation is totally false 2. there is no medical certificate 3. now i am job less...not possible for giving four thousand rs per month. after complain my has not allow to join my duty. 4. my wife quite educated. she is with M.A. degree and doing job in pvt sector. i am B.A. kindly help me.....