Recruitment rule based previous judgements and law

Hello sir, I have cleared the J.E (E&M) post in municipal council,port Blair,Andamans.There are only 2 posts but name is in 3rd but have found that the candidate in 1st position is not qualified according to the Recruitment rule of municipal council.Qualification is degree/diploma in electrical/mechanical/automobile engineering but the 1st candidate is degree in electrical and electronic engineering which is not in RR but the municipal dept is proceeding with the recruitment and this is not the first time even 4 years ago they did the same thing but no body objected but this time i had objected. In the court my lawyer tried convincing the judge at high court that the candidate doesnot has the requisite qualification and this is even clearly mentioned in DOPT guidelines(framing of RR) that equivalent cannot be asked as it is said in guidelines not to include "or equivalent" term in RR and asked to show an exhaustive list of qualification in RR.but the judge wouldnot listen to my lawyer for stay and instead asked municipal to proceed with recruitment and final decision stays with court he said.Asked the depart to check for equivalence from a technical Institute. My question is if the law says a candidate cant be taken without the qualification in RR and against the DOPT guidelines why court starts to search for equivalent and is there any judgement that i can reffer to in court to get advantage and to get hearing in my favour.please suggest how can i take this case foreward as with the next hearing high court judge will be new and i can think of a fresh opportunity to go with. My another question is that is there any law which can be stated or judgement on the repeated illegel appointment outside of recruitment rule(RR) by the Department, and this is the second time they are recruiting this qualification without adding in recruitment rule(RR).please suggest its urgent????