Original landlord has no roof rights. Any construction has to be done as per the sanction plans. Original landlord has no rights on the basement.
Hello, TO SUMMARIZE MY QUERY, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY MENTION IN ANY OF THE SALE DEED (OF ANY OF THE FLOOR OF A HOUSE) OF THE ROOF RIGHT OR THE RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT NEW BASEMENT (DURING RECONSTRUCTION), WILL THE RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT ABOVE THE ROOF AND/OR THE BASEMENT LIE WITH THE ORIGINAL LANDLORD OR WILL IT BE PROPORTIONATE. The same query is explained in a little more detail below In 2007 I inherited the ground floor of a house having a total of 4 floors. All of above floors were already sold off many years back. My sister being the original landlord. The second floor was sold off in 1988 and the top third floor was also purchased by the owner of the second floor in 1993. In both the cases there is no mention of any roof right in the sale deed whatsoever. Since it's a very old house, all the house owners are considering reconstructing the house. Currently no construction is permissible above Basement + stilt + 1 + 3 floors i.e 4 floors in our area. But still a very important question still remains that if and whenever in near or unforeseeable future if permission to construct above 4 floors is ever allowed then in absence of any mention of roof right in the sale agreement of any of the above floors who will have the right to construct if such a permission to construct becomes applicable. Secondly similarly if a basement is constructed during reconstruction then will the right be proportionate or will it be the right of the original landlord (in absence of mention of the basement in any of the above floor sales deed).
Original landlord has no roof rights. Any construction has to be done as per the sanction plans. Original landlord has no rights on the basement.
In the absence of any specific agreement as to exclusive ownership, everything will be proportionate, including roof rights and basement rights .
Key Considerations:
No Mention of Roof Rights:
Basement Construction Rights:
Reconstruction and Future Construction Rights:
Legal Interpretation of Roof and Basement Rights:
Roof Rights:
Basement Rights:
Proportional Ownership:
Answers to Your Specific Questions:
Future Right to Construct Above the Roof:
Right to the Basement During Reconstruction:
Practical Steps to Protect Your Rights:
Mutual Agreement:
Update Property Documents:
Seek Legal Guidance:
For detailed, personalized advice, consider a phone consultancy. Hope you find the information helpful. You are free to contact me for further discussion. If you could spare two minutes of your time to write a review, it would be greatly appreciated and bring immense happiness to read it. Thank you. Shubham Goyal.
To address your query regarding the right to construct above the roof and the right to construct a basement in the absence of any explicit mention in the sale deeds, here's a detailed breakdown:
1. Right to Construct Above the Roof:
In the absence of any specific mention of roof rights in the sale deeds of the individual floors, typically, ownership of the roof would remain with the original landlord (your sister, in this case). However, it is important to consider the following:
Nature of Roof Rights: If the sale deeds of the second and third floors (which were sold to the respective buyers) do not specifically mention roof rights, this usually means that the rights to the roof, including any future construction, remain with the owner of the ground floor or the original landlord.
Proportional Rights: In some cases, even if there is no explicit mention, proportionality can be inferred. For example, if the ground floor owner decides to build additional floors above, the rights to the roof could potentially be shared with other owners on the basis of the area they own. However, in the absence of clear terms in the sale deed, such a right is typically assumed to lie with the original owner (in this case, your sister). This would depend on the local laws and regulations, as well as any agreements that may exist between the owners of the floors.
Permission for Future Construction: If permission to construct above the 4th floor is granted in the future, and if there is no specific agreement in the sale deeds, the original owner (your sister) may have the right to apply for the construction or decide how the space above the 4th floor is used, unless the other floor owners jointly claim rights to it.
2. Right to Construct Basement:
Proportionality: In the case of constructing a basement, the right would typically be proportional to the area owned by the respective floor owners, unless otherwise agreed upon in the sale deed. If the basement construction is not mentioned in any of the sale deeds, it would be treated as part of the overall common property and would be subject to decisions taken jointly by all the floor owners.
Original Landlord's Rights: The original landlord (your sister) may have certain rights to the basement, particularly if the sale deeds do not specify the use of common areas or future constructions. However, if the owners of the other floors have been using the land together, they could argue for shared ownership of any new construction, including the basement.
Legal Precedent: In general, in the absence of explicit rights in the sale deed, the right to construct would likely be subject to the joint consent of all floor owners. The original landlord may have a claim, but it would be proportional to the shares of the property. This would depend on how the land is jointly owned and local property laws.
Recommendation:
To avoid future disputes, it is advisable to have a legal agreement or amendment to the existing sale deeds to clearly specify the rights to the roof and basement. This will provide clarity on future construction rights, particularly if the laws change to allow construction above the 4th floor or the addition of a basement.
It would be prudent to consult a property lawyer to clarify these issues and potentially draft an agreement that ensures all parties' interests are protected.
The roof is a common area for all occupants of a building, and the landowner does not have exclusive rights to it
The Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) considers the roof to be a common area
It is illegal for a flat owner to sell or put the roof to exclusive use.
Dear Client,
As there is no mention of roof rights or basement rights in the sale deeds of the property, these rights usually remain with the original landlord or their inheritor (you in this case). Roof rights are not automatically transferred unless explicitly stated in the sale deeds, meaning the right to construct additional floors, if permitted in the future, would belong to the original landlord. Similarly, the basement being a part of the undivided property would remain under the ownership of the original landlord unless proportionate rights are agreed upon by all co-owners. For this reason, it is better to draft a legal agreement among all co-owners regarding the rights and responsibilities related to the roof, basement, and any potential reconstruction. Consult a property lawyer to formalize these.
Hope that this helps you to solve your problem.