Dear Client,
Marketing an apartment for resale in a building under construction that continues to have construction delays was undoubtedly fraught with some difficulties, particularly in relation to the concerns regarding the inability of an investor reluctant to sign the Tripartite Agreement. The primary concern for consideration here is that your interests are safeguarded, especially because this project has been experiencing some setbacks, and the investor's decision to back out and opt not to be part of the Tripartite Agreement makes the transaction more challenging.
A potential solution is to work out with the investor that an initial payment will be made contingent on the agreed-upon amount of future revenue. In a spirit of negotiation, you could suggest a plan through which a part of the payment is made before the launch of the project and the rest of the amount is paid and retained in trust until ownership is handed over. This also ensures that the investor gets at least some funds upon the completion of the first part, and you are also shielded in case there are likely to be further delays. This arrangement would also call for a precise legal framework that would lay down various provisions in a bid to unlock the remaining balance. No doubt it is wise to consult a lawyer to draw up or at least to inspect this agreement in order to make sure that all such clauses are cogent and the interests of the parties are shielded.
The other thing that can be done is to talk with the bank of your choice and possibly come to an agreement on how the loan is paid out in phases based on project progress or possession. Banks generally release funds with respect to construction work completed, and you can negotiate a specific payment schedule you feel would safeguard a part of the funds until you take possession. This might entail explanations with the bank and, with the help of records of the current situation and the manner in which the progress of the project is being slowed, getting consent.
If the investor remains inflexible and the bank cannot accommodate your request for a conditional disbursement plan, you may need to reconsider the purchase. Paying the full amount without any assurance of possession exposes you to significant risks, especially in a delayed project. The investor's reluctance to pay GST again suggests they are looking to minimise their costs at your expense, which could indicate potential red flags in the transaction.
It's essential to assess the potential for further delays and the overall credibility of the builder. If the delays seem likely to extend beyond the current RERA extension and there is no clear timeline for completion, it might be prudent to explore other options.