Dear client, I understand that you have several questions regarding the division of assets and property after the passing of Ravi and Jothi, and the actions taken by their legal heirs, Kumar and Meena. Please note that I am an AI language model and cannot provide legal advice. However, I can offer you some general information that may help you understand your situation better.
Can Meena claim 50% of the jewels taken from the bank?
As a legal heir of Jothi, Meena may have a claim to a share of the jewels in the bank locker. However, the exact amount she is entitled to would depend on a variety of factors, including the laws of inheritance in your jurisdiction, any will or testamentary documents left behind by Jothi, and any agreements or understandings reached between Kumar and Meena.
In order to prove her entitlement to a share of the jewels, Meena may need to produce evidence such as bank loan slips or other documents indicating that Jothi had jewelry in the locker, and that the jewelry was paid off with funds from both Kumar and Meena. She may also need to demonstrate that there was an understanding or agreement between her and Kumar regarding the division of the jewelry.
How to prove that Kumar did not share the jewelry taken from the bank?
In order to prove that Kumar did not share the jewelry taken from the bank, Meena may need to produce evidence such as witness statements, text messages, emails, or other documentation that indicate that Kumar did not follow through on his promise to give her the jewelry. If she signed a white paper as you mentioned, she may need to demonstrate that she was misled or coerced into signing the document and that it does not accurately reflect the agreement or understanding between her and Kumar.
Will the signed hand-written white paper be valid?
The validity of the signed hand-written white paper will depend on several factors, including the specific language used in the document, the circumstances surrounding its creation, and whether or not it accurately reflects the agreement or understanding between Kumar and Meena. If Meena can demonstrate that she was misled or coerced into signing the document, or that it does not accurately reflect the true nature of the agreement or understanding, then she may be able to challenge the validity of the document.
How to prove that Jothi had jewelry in the locker?
To prove that Jothi had jewelry in the locker, Meena may need to produce evidence such as bank statements, loan documents, or other records indicating that Jothi had a jewelry loan with the bank. She may also need to produce witness statements or other evidence indicating that Jothi mentioned the jewelry to her before her passing.
How to prove that Jothi had jewelry in the house?
To prove that Jothi had jewelry in the house, Meena may need to produce evidence such as photographs, receipts, or other documentation indicating that Jothi purchased or possessed jewelry. She may also need to produce witness statements or other evidence indicating that Jothi mentioned the jewelry to her before her passing.
In summary, Meena may have a claim to a share of the jewelry in the bank locker, but the exact amount she is entitled to will depend on a variety of factors. To prove her entitlement, she may need to produce evidence indicating that Jothi had jewelry in the locker and that both she and Kumar contributed funds to pay off the loan. She may also need to demonstrate that there was an agreement or understanding regarding the division of the jewelry, and that Kumar did not follow through on his promise to give her the jewelry. Additionally, she may need to provide evidence indicating that Jothi had jewelry in the house, and that Kumar has not disclosed its whereabouts.