1. The bank will give the borrower 60 days time in the legal notice, if the borrower do not respond within the time limit, the bank may proceed with further action as envisaged in the law for the purpose.
2. The DRT will not get involved in this case.
Only the aggrieved person has to approach DRT seeking relief.
3. If you want to file an objection or injunction/stay petition before DRT, you may have to approach the jurisdictional Tribunal within which the bank falls.
If all the requirements to file the petition before the DRT is properly complied, then the DRT will take the same on its file within a week.
4. It depends on the bank which is taking action to bring the property for auction sale, there is no prescribed time limit, it may be immediately or a little later too.
5. The bank will follow the procedures as laid down in the law for this purpose.
6. a. The question is not about the higher value of the assets given as collateral security, if the auction bid amount is in excess then the bank will adjust its outstanding amount and refund the balance to the borrower.
b. It is very much valid.
c. It is the problem of the company and not of the bank
d. The question is about the default in loan repayment, hence the personal issues of the guarantor will not be entertained by the court.
6. The bank can take action simultaneously agaisnt the directors and the guarantors.
Supreme court in a judgment has clearly stated that the guarantor cannot insist that the creditor must first exhaust all remedies against the principal debtor before recovering the debts from surety holders.
“There can be no dispute to the settled legal proposition that in view of the provisions of Section 128 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the liability of the guarantor/surety is co-extensive with that of the debtor.
“Therefore, the creditor has a right to obtain a decree against the surety and the principal debtor.
“The surety has no right to restrain execution of the decree against him until the creditor has exhausted his remedy against the principal debtor for the reason that it is the business of the surety/guarantor to see whether the principal debtor has paid or not.