• Applicability of Section 12(2) of CPC - How decree obtained by fraud can be cancelled or set aside?

Need your opinion to reopen a case under Section 12(2) of CPC. 
I read somewhere that, "Judgment, decree or order can be impeached on grounds of fraud, misrepresentation or lack of jurisdiction under Section 12(2) Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Relief can be obtained by aggrieved person by application to court which passed final judgment, decree or order and not by a separate suit."

Issue:
My father has filed suit in 2004 claiming the lands in Survey A and B belongs to his father (Expired in 1995) registered under document no. 1 and 2 in the year 1952, produced khata, tax paid receipt and claimed defendants without any manner of right , interest are interfering with peaceful possession of our property. A case filled against multiple Site allottees sold to them by private layout developer carved in our lands, RTC stands in my grandfather name still today. 

Site allottee written statement saying, site was allotted to them by private layout in the year 1995 and they have paid taxes and obtained khata from bbmp and are in possession. Site allottees made Private layout developer party to the suit. 

Private layout Defendant submitted written statement that, my grandfather has executed them GPA compressing of our Survey A and B and Survey C ( This does not belongs to us). 

Here interestingly, though the site was carved in our survey A and B, private layout sold the site with the sale deed recitals saying that site is carved in survey C. This has confused my father and the lawyer contesting the case. My father has not made actual owner C party to the suit. The case was lost in 2012, the GPA was accepted in court as my lawyer has not challenged it and 

also Judge in judgement observed that GPA has been tempered with use of whitener at several places. IN spite of that, the Judgement was given in favor of private layout and site allottees. My lawyer did not seek for commissioner appointment for Survey and not challenged the unregistered GPA lacking stamp duty. 

My father passed away 2016. 

Now recently, the actual owner of C had a dispute with private layout regarding another of his property Y being encroached upon by private layout, upon obtaining RTC for survey C, he found that the RTC stands in his grandfather name which was fraudulently acquired by private layout and fake GPA has been created with use of whitener at several places which includes our survey A and B and his survey C in my grandfather name. 

It is also found that, private layout has converted our lands, the actual conversion order says, lands coming under survey A and B should be used for Park purpose. But, all the sites carved in our lands fraudulently has be mispresented as carved out in Survey C in sale deed recitals.

1. the fraud has come to my knowledge now. Can I reopen my father case under Section 12(2) of CPC or Is it barred by limitation. 
2. can my father sister can file a separate partition suit to avoid court fee. suit is barred res judicata?
Asked 4 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu

2 answers received in 30 minutes.

Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.

9 Answers

A clear fraud is played in your case. Fraud vitiates all proceedings.  The provision of law is very clear. The established principle of law is, “Rraus est celare fraudem,” that is, it is a fraud to conceal fraud. There is no limitation against setting a decree obtained by fraud. Not only fraud on you, the defendants have even played fraud on Court using forged documents. Seek review of entire proceedings seeking setting aside of fraudulent decree. You can also file criminal complaint under section 468 and 471 or submit an application to the seeking complaint by court under section 340 of Cr. P.C.


you have a good case, do not try to save on court fee. Challenge the decree in review. You need not have to pay any fee for review apart from the fee of lawyer. 

Ravi Shinde
Advocate, Hyderabad
5125 Answers
42 Consultations

Your father ought to have filed appeal against impugned order passed in 2012

 

2) since no appeal has been filed claim is barred by limitation 

 

3) if developer has suppressed material facts and made false statements on oath you can take legal proceedings developer but have to prove fraud as fraud vitiates decree 

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
99775 Answers
8145 Consultations

Yes you can file suit for cancellation within 3 yrs of knowledge. 

You can't avoid court fee. Separate partition is your choice

Prashant Nayak
Advocate, Mumbai
34514 Answers
249 Consultations

If your father had instituted the suit and has not prosecuted the case properly due to which he lost the case or if he had conducted the case properly and the court has not appreciated the evidences he produced before court to support his case, he can very well file an appeal against the aggrieved judgment. From your contents it can be seen that the GPA was not challenged properly and the court has admitted the GPA deed hence there is no question of fraud played upon court by the party who relied upon the GPA deed.

The aggrieved party is your father who is no more now.  Besides you  cannot say that your father did not conduct the case properly  and you cannot throw the blames on your advocate for not seeking the appointment of advocate commissioner to ascertain the facts.

Your father being the plaintiff should have instructed your advocate properly or may be he had not shown interest towards this subject due pecuniary or any other reasons. 

In any case in my opinion the reopening of the case for the reasons namely that the defendant played fraud upon court is not maintainable neither your application would be entertained  by court, you can think about preferring an appeal for the reasons you rely upon.

 2.  If your father's sister is entitled to a share in the property and if her rights were deprived the she can very well file a suit for declaration of her title, separate possession of her share in the property

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
89977 Answers
2492 Consultations

You can take injunction for not creating third party rights in the same

Prashant Nayak
Advocate, Mumbai
34514 Answers
249 Consultations

File appeal along with application for condonation of delay 

 

2) delay of 9 years in filing appeal has to be explained 

 

3)enclose documents which  prove fraudulent transfer by developer

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
99775 Answers
8145 Consultations

1. You can file a RFA on the grounds of your grievances meted to you by the trial court judgment, however you may have to file different applications namely, to implead you as LRs, to condone delay to prefer this appeal etc along with the memorandum of appeal.

2. Your aunt should consult an experienced lawyer ion the local and may proceed as suggested to her. 

 

Please remember that the RTC records or any other revenue records are not the title documents, the court may not entertain the claim for title and relief for injunction on the basis of the documents namely RTC etc. 

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
89977 Answers
2492 Consultations

Dear client,

 

The title in your case here is disputed, and hence you cannot you cannot get injunction without declaration. The Supreme Court has observed that a suit simpliciter for permanent injunction without claiming declaration of title is maintainable only in cases where the plaintiff's title is not in dispute or under a cloud.

 

Thank you.

Anik Miu
Advocate, Bangalore
11014 Answers
125 Consultations

Dear Sir,

Normally, Suits are barred except on the grounds of fraud and misrepresentation. You have to prove that such decree was passed by playing fraud and misrepresentation upon the other party and also upon the Hon'ble Court. 

======================================================================================

Section 12 of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 "Bar to further suit"

Where a plaintiff is precluded by rules from instituting a further suit in respect of any particular cause of action, he shall not be entitled to institute a suit in respect of such cause of action in any Court to which this Code applies.

 

 

Kishan Dutt Kalaskar
Advocate, Bangalore
6230 Answers
499 Consultations

Ask a Lawyer

Get legal answers from lawyers in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous!
  Ask a lawyer