The Indian Legal System categorizes Foreign Judgments and Awards from all the quarters of the world into two groups, Viz. (a) Judgments and Awards coming from the ‘Reciprocating Territories’ of India and (b) Judgments and awards coming from the ‘Non-Reciprocating Territories’ of India.
New Zealand come to Reciprocating Territories of India.
A combined reading of section 13 and 44A makes it clear that a decree of a reciprocating territory can be executed through a district court, and the judgment debtor is entitled to contest the execution petition if it can be shown that the judgment is not conclusive, i.e., it comes within any of the exceptions under section 13 to (f )
Hon’ble High Court of Madras in P.A.K. Muthiah Chettiar (died) and Ors. Vs. K.S. Rm. Firm Shwebo, Burma and Ors case observed that with regard to decrees of a reciprocating territory contemplated in the explanation to Section 44-A no suit is necessary but the same can be executed by the application of the provisions of Section 47, Civil P. C. The distinction that has to be borne in mind is that reciprocating territories enjoy greater privilege regarding execution of decrees of their superior Courts in our country than are enjoyed by the non-reciprocating territories.
It was ultimately decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India that once the defendant has submitted to the jurisdiction of a foreign Court, a decree passed by that court, even if ex-parte, is a valid foreign decree.
File EP before District court and validate the same.