Land is a state subject. In a state, government-owned properties fall under the control of the revenue department, and the ownership of such properties vests with the city collector. For developing housing projects on such land parcels, developers, state as well as private builders, have to take the collector’s permission.
Since these are leasehold properties, residents of such housing societies are legally acknowledged as Class-II occupants, and their rights are limited when compared to Class-I occupants who own freehold properties.
For renting, mortgaging, gifting and selling these properties, the property owners need the prior permission of the collector. Apart from taking the collector permission to carry out the transaction, property owners have to pay a transfer fee if they plan to sell their property. After a revision on transfer charges was implemented last year, rates of collector properties have increased four times in the city.
In case a buyer transferred the membership within five years of formation of such societies in Mumbai they will have to pay Rs 1,000 per square foot or three per cent of the ready reckoner rates prevalent in the area, whichever is higher, as transfer fee. In the case of transfers or sale of apartments after five years of society formation, an amount equal to two times the transfer fee, calculated as per the revised rates, would be payable. In case of leave and licence, the owner has to pay five per cent of the total amount earmarked in the lease agreement.
With the government dragging its feet on conversion of collector’s land to freehold, the redevelopment of 3,000 societies in Mumbai and 22,000 across the state on such plots is stuck for almost two years.
The societies have been demanding an amnesty scheme to convert their society land from Class 2 (collector) to Class 1 (freehold) be implemented. This would ensure that the land would be freed from government control.
However, one can regularise the construction by taking the collector’s permission after paying a penalty, which would be double the transfer charge.
Converting the land to freehold would end dependency on the collector.