1)for sale in India the company must have obtained necessary regulatory approvals .
2) it could not have been sold unless it met the legal requirements
3) as on date the product is not being sold in india
4) there would be no products available for testing in india . had the product failed safety tests it would have been banned and company forced to recall its products
5) the company and its officers prosecuted for fraudulently selling product in india in spite of being aware that it did not satisfy quality standards laid down
6) as on date no question of any prosecution arises unless some employee squeals the beans to the authorities and provides necessary evidence .
7)let the employee provide necessary documentary evidence of health issues with the product to the authorities and the management insistence on selling the same in spite of being aware of adverse health effects
8) the company and senior officers in charge of day to day management would be prosecuted