Under the Indian Law, the employment agreements with negative covenants is valid and legally enforceable if the parties agree with their free consent i.e. without fraud, coercion, undue influence, mistake and misrepresentation. .
The Indian courts have held that in the event of a breach of contract by the employee, the employer shall be entitled to recover damages only if a considerable amount of expenditure was borne by the employer.
Indian law mandates the employment bonds to be “reasonable” in order to be valid.
The validity of Employment bonds can be challenged on the basis of Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act. Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 prohibits any agreement in restraint of trade and profession. Any agreement in trade and profession according to Section 27 is void.
As per the mandate of Section 27, any terms and conditions of an agreement which directly or indirectly compels the employee to serve the employer or puts a restriction on them joining the competitor or other employer is not valid under the Indian law, The employee has right to resign from the employment even if he has agreed in the employment bond to serve the employer for a specific period of time.
In view of the above facts and grounds, your advocate may file a recovery suit but it depends on how strongly he presents your case before the concerned court to convince court about the injustice meted out to you by the company.
In fact it was your mistake for having paid the demanded amount to the company.
You may take a decision after thinking over the pros and cons especially the more losses you may suffer due to the proposed litigation