yes at time of passing of order all accused have to remain present in court
in my case today which was on order/judgement in court judge was ready to pass orders against accused but he told us accuse no 2 is not present so he can't pass the orders and gave next date 2nd april 2014 very upset day and my advocate was present in morning and i gave him his fee and he told me that i will also come in evening as judge told us to wait till 3pm for orders but he did not came it can be possible that defenders are doing all this to stop my advocate from coming and case can go further. and it is necessary for all the accuse to be present while orders. as judge told us.
why it is necessary sir accused to be present
and accused person advocate should also be there or only accused persons should there and if accused person not come to the court what court can do for him
sentence has to be pronounced in presence of accused . hence court will pronounce judgement when all accused are present . if they are not present court will adjourn the case .
today i have seen my yesterday's court order which is below: 24.03.2014 Present: Complainant in person with counsel. Accused Satpal in person. Accused Rajpal absent. Matter is listed for order on charge, however, accused Rajpal is not present despite various calls. Issue NBW against accused Rajpal and notice to his surety for 02.04.2014. sir this is the yesterday's judge order it is in my favour or not.
nbw is non-bailable warrant?
yes NBW is non bailable warrant . since accused rajpal is absent court has adjourned case and issued NBW against him
The law commands that accused should be personally present in court at the time when court has to rule on his innocence or guilt. Hence, the postponement by court.
Since Rajpal was not present in court a NBW has been issued against him. Police will now have to arrest and produce him in the court.
i want to know that while framing of charges against accuse should plantiff also be there or not. in court