you yourself mentioned that failure to refer cases to cvo can invite discipilinary action against the da
Clause 4.2 of vigilance manual of bank deals with “ JURISDICTION OF CVO” which is as “ All the cases of officials up to the level of Scale-IV or which do not fall within the direct jurisdiction of the Commission are required to be referred to the CVO for concurrence before any action is taken against them. The cases under this category are known as ‘Non CVC cases’. It may also be mention that failure to refer the cases to CVO can invite Disciplinary Action against the DA.” In terms of above clause whether concurrence for placing officer upto Scale-IV under suspension is required by DA from CVO or DA can independently suspend an officer without the concurrence of CVO.
Ask a question and receive multiple answers in one hour.
Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.
you yourself mentioned that failure to refer cases to cvo can invite discipilinary action against the da
clause 4.2 is explicit . for any action against class IV officer concurrence of CVO is must . DA cannot indepedently suspend any officer without consent of CVO .
Clause 4.2 puts an embargo on the DA insofar as taking action against any officer upto scale IV is concerned. In view of this concurrence of CVO is indispensable before placing under suspension a officer of upto class IV. Taking any disciplinary action against an officer of class IV is within the exclusive realm of CVO.
Pl check definition of disciplery action.To my mind suspension may not be treated as action against any official.
I Need your guidance for definition of disciplinary action.
What will be the status of concurrence in the eye of law if given after suspension.
every organisation has its own sets of disciplinary action,it can be demotion,removal from services,temporary suspension etc