yes 3rd son has to be made party to suit . tomorrow 3rd son will sell his share . you need to protect your interests . . obtain an injunction restraining him from selling his share too
sir i want to know that i have filed a civil suit in delhi highcourt against two son's of a person from whom i purchased plot through irrecovable gpa bcoz his son sold the same plot to other person but sir confusion is that in mutation after death of main owner it came on his 3 son's name in which out of 3 two have sold their share and one has not so for it i have filed case against 2 son's of the owner i have to file a case against 3rd one also or not bcoz his name is also there in mutation.
First answer received in 30 minutes.
Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.
yes 3rd son has to be made party to suit . tomorrow 3rd son will sell his share . you need to protect your interests . . obtain an injunction restraining him from selling his share too
my advocate has not made the 3rd son party in the case only he filed a case against 2 son's as they have only sold their share what should i do for 3rd one best suggestions thankyou so much..
i have filed a case in 2010 now 3rd son can become party or not but i have given application to tehsildar and sub-registrar against them and told about the case pending in highcourt
you can take out chamber summons for adding 3rd son as party in existing suit . or file separate case against 3rd son your lawyer will do the needful
The third son should certainly have been made a party to the case as the property has been sold to him who can sell it further to some one.
We do not know as to at which stage your case is currently pending adjudication in the court. However, it can be safely said that it may now be too late to make him a party to the case. Hence, you may in order to safeguard your legal interests file a separate case against the third son to pre-empt any contemplated move by him to sell the property further.