I am confused. I got two different answers from your advocates. One says, everything inside the four walls of the building are included in carpet area. Another says the lift and stairs are included in common area and not in carpet area. These are generic definitions and not specific to my situation.
The lift and staircase built within the building i.e., within the carpet area is not a part of carpet area, you cannot claim it to be part of carpet area.
The bank has all the rights to say that this will not include within the carpet area and may not pay the rent for the stair case or lift which is within the building because that is an essential thing for access to their premises.
My question is in our case the lift and stairs are inside the four walls of the building, we built it exclusively for them keeping in mind their security reasons. These stairs and lift are similar to what you provide inside a two storied duplex or a villa inside the four walls. We could have easily built both the stairs and lift outside the four walls. The bank is not even including the area of the floor below the stairs where the carpet can be spread.
So, do you include the stairs and lift inside the four walls of a villa/duplex in the carpet area or not?
You cannot give any justification to this, the law is very clear about the stair case and the lifts while calculating the carpet area.
Carpet area is the area that can actually be covered by a carpet, or the area of the apartment excluding the thickness of inner walls. Carpet area does not include the space covered by common areas such as lobby, lift, stairs, play area, etc. Carpet area is the actual area you get for use in a housing unit.
Therefore you cannot claim that the staircase or lift is part of carpet area.
This is not a residential building, you have let it out on rent for the commercial purpose
There is no question of the bank utilising the stair case or lift for their own use or it is being used by their customers or anyone.
Your case may not be maintainable in law.