Acts to establish offence under section 376, 315 IPC
A Women alleged False F.I.R on me , that on the assurance of marriage i have sexually abused her for last two years , as a result she get pregnant and after pregnancy i pressured her to get the child aborted . after eight months of her pregancy i one day visited to her house and assaulted her badly on the abdomen , then after she fainted and taken to the hospital where the doctors by the operation taken out the dead child ,on the basis of this statement police lodged FIR Under section 315, 376 IPC on me . Subsequently police arrested me and put in the jail.
after getting the copy of Charge Sheet i found that Police Mentioned that there was No telephonic communication between us as stated by the prosecutrix in the FIR , Also the MLC of the women shows that she is habitual to sexual intercourse . The BED HEAD TICKET of the hospital clearly shows that due to leakage she has gone through Prolonged PROM , PRE TERM with her & her family consent. Also the sonography clears that FOETUS IS Good , Alive & healthy on the date she told to be assaulted. Not only this as per medical card she has born healthy & crying child with AP 10 OUT OF 10. SEVERAL DOCUMENTS GIVEN BY HER DURING THE INVESTIGATION IS FALSE & FABRICATED.such as caste certificate to imposes SC/ST Act.
Sir please advise that on the basis of the above stated conditions , whether the said offences of the IPC 315,376 STANDS ON ME .i work as a RTI ACTIVIST . With the Help of Police several FIR HAS BEEN REGISTERED AGAINST me out of which some of them is disposed after Investigation. I have continuously made the COMPLAINT TO VARIOUS POLICE AUTHORITY previously THAT i will be trapped in False cases related to the disclosure of corruption through RTI Act.
Asked 10 years ago in Criminal Law
simply saying that the person is asking ransom of Rs. 70,000.00 per month publicly other wise kidnapped his child constitute the offence under section 387 IPC . Police made this counter case after i have registered the case under section 294,323,506 AGAINST THE Same person .
Asked 10 years ago
